transplant

Examples of allograft

allograft
Three renal allograft recipients on immunosuppressive therapy had cutaneous mucormycosis, with extension of infection into the transplanted kidney in one of them.
In experimental animal models, these d i v e r s e methods have all been successful in inducing long-term acceptance of islet allografts.
Since 1991, mitral valve allografts have been used in our institution to replace the mitral valve.
A monoclonal antibody to the interleukin2 receptor enhances the survival of neural allografts.
However, further studies are required to define more clearly a direct role for heat shock proteins in the induction and progression of allograft rejection.
The unifocalization procedures were accomplished using valveless pulmonary arterial cryopreserved allografts.
When allografts were rejected, the graft epidermis receded from the borders of the graft so that rejection was easily recognizable.
Pancreatic islet allograft prolongation by donorspecific blood transfusions treated with ultraviolet irradiation.
Synergistic prolongation of allograft survival in combination with cyclosporin in rat and do.
In one patient with a hypoplastic pulmonary trunk and narrow pulmonary valve, we inserted an aortic allograft.
Untreated autologous pericardium was used in preference to glutaraldehyde-treated pericardium or artificial or allograft patches.
Embryonic resistance to tumour necrosis factor-alpha mediated cytotoxicity: novel mechanism underlying maternal immunological tolerance to the fetal allograft.
The precise influence of heat shock proteins o n allograft survival is currently unclear.
The patient will eventually outgrow his allograft, but then a larger allograft can be placed in a relatively easy operation.
They employed a valved allograft to establish continuity from the right ventricle to the pulmonary arteries and another non-valved allograft for establishing aortic continuity.
These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors.