| 词汇 | example_english_clause |
| 释义 | Examples of clauseThese examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors. Object-final orders occur in finite clauses by verb-raising. If infinitives did not raise overtly, but objects in subordinate clauses did, the order is explained. During this period (until the age of 4;4), target-like subordinate clauses amount to 4 per cent of all subordinate clauses. The rate of speech (words per minute), number of narrative words, and number of narrative clauses produced were measured for each subject. To illustrate one class of syntactic problems, consider two sentences with relative clauses below. Now we show how to connect the clauses with the variables. In other words, the abrupt change in the asymptotic probability of satisfiability occurs when the number of clauses is proportional to the number of variables. First-told stories also contained fewer categories of aspect, and in three out of four cases they had fewer clauses marked with extended aspectual categories. The second clause's flexibility will allow for cases that are often deemed important,18 such as mild hypertension. However, clauses regarding research on human embryos were not specifically described. In effect, coordinate clauses are simply two sentences connected by a conjunction. Expressing basic constituent relations in single clauses is fairly straightforward since any consistently used word order can function as a grammatical device. Whereas the particle tended to follow the verb in main clauses, it tended to precede the verb in subordinate clauses. Comparison with object clauses in this respect is not possible, as there is no systematic analysis of their information status to date. A further difference between extraposed clauses and object clauses can be detected in their occurrence in different text types. Although the present discussion relates to the that-complementizer in extraposed clauses, the proposed explanation, because of its general cognitive nature, also applies to object clauses. There are examples of nonmodal small clauses in (43). The most recent context expansion concerns the position of the subject in subordinate clauses. The 149 clauses with late subject order have been omitted. Issues that have been addressed in this connection include: is there a separate location in the structure of clauses that is associated with agreement marking? Whatever theoretical approach one takes, it is clear that clauses such as (4) should be regarded as innovations. The word order seen in (43)-(44) was therefore completely lost when topicalization ceased to operate in nonfinite clauses after 1550. In nonfinite clauses, topicalization seems to have become impossible after circa 1550. In subjectless clauses like (10) which happen to contain an auxiliary, the object is positioned before the auxiliary, as in (11). In other words, they are acting as parentheticals rather than true clauses. Well in reporting clauses: meaning and form of a 'lexical filler'. Finally, there are adverbial clauses of various semantic types, for example clauses expressing reason/cause (10) and manner and comparison (11). Whether the behaviour that goes with subordinate clauses, such as stating reasons, indicating time relationships and so on, has a genetic basis is another question. The two parents then sat in a coffee shop and listed the clauses they understood should be included in such an agreement. A developmental implication is that these children have a lexical basis for moving into the syntax of clauses with different types of argument structure. Both clauses cancel an application of tl against an application of (:), but the output stream of the network o must be treated specially. The proofs for the remaining clauses present no difficulties. Results indicate a strong correlation between children's ability to use the subjunctive mood in relative clauses and their capacity for understanding false beliefs. The study aimed to examine the relationship between children's performance on false belief tasks and their ability to produce subjunctive relative clauses. The evaluative clauses were then coded for the inclusion of lexical items from six categories. In the no prompt condition, there were fewer evaluative clauses than narrative clauses, and both categories became more frequent with age. In particular, we predicted that for younger children animacy would elicit the production of object-dislocated clauses only. Note that the three clauses that make use of ^-reduction correspond precisely to the three clauses in the environment approach that extend the environment. The required transformation of each proposition to a set of clauses can be specified by the following rules. If we look at the development of the various types of relative clauses, we find that subj-relatives are especially frequent among the earliest relative clauses. In addition to similarity, the input seems to be an important determinant of the early production of relative clauses. Why do children use so many subj-relative clauses ? Alternatively, one might hypothesize that subj-relatives are dominant in early child language because children tend to use relative clauses with animate head nouns. In fact, as can be seen in (11a-b) and (12a-b), a few relative clauses differ only in the placement of the finite verb. Table 1 shows that the ability to produce subjunctive relative clauses increases with age. Thus, they clearly had knowledge of subjunctive form, but not of its use with relative clauses. Thus, the observation does not suggest anything at all about children's sensitivity to embedded clauses. The language has postpositions but not prepositions, and noun modifiers including relative clauses precede their heads. All the clauses of a case represent the same computation. We assume the following clauses are applied exhaustively from top-tobottom. Most of these studies investigate the acquisition of relative clauses in the framework of generative grammar. In both languages, children's early relative clauses function semantically like simple main clauses; but the source constructions are somewhat different. Of the top ten objects other than complement clauses, again eight are pronouns. If children do have an adult-like grammar of relative clauses, then why should children make the error they do with sentences of type (15) ? Typically, equi control of the null subject in adverbial clauses ending in nagara ' while\\during ' is restricted to matrix subjects. However, their notion of acceptability is defined and verified on call-patterns instead of program clauses. A program is called well-moded if all of its clauses are well-moded. A program is simply moded if all of its clauses are. They are given in class definitions that can use multiple inheritance to define the method clauses of a given class. A program is a finite set of clauses. The analysis exploits functional dependencies and mode information, as well as a set of sufficient conditions to detect mutually exclusive clauses. Consider now the recursive clauses (w), (c), (p1), (p2), and (s). In other words, the solution constrains integer variables appearing in the clauses. The first sentence (i) is translated into two clauses (a) and (b) of logic programming. The term of a "program" denotes a set of clauses with default, weak, and strict negations. In contrast to the operational method, the natural one is independent from the order of the body atoms in clauses. The pair ac is not an edge of (d) because a belongs to 4 clauses only and a c d is not one of them. Here we just discuss the theory as it applies to successful computations using definite clauses. A process is composed by a set of clauses and a goal. Note, however, that embedded implications are not allowed in augmented clauses. The selection rule s that always selects this atom together with all program clauses is an input-consuming selection rule, and also a standard selection rule. We mention here delay declarations, input-consuming derivations and guarded clauses. The formula f is a conjunction (list) of propositional clauses. We also say that a logic program is free if it contains only free clauses. However, it fails to characterize answer sets if we allow negation in the head of clauses (free programs). Thus, the notion of derivability associated with a program is nondeterministic, as in the case of individual clauses. We also distinguish and discuss the class of definite programs (programs with clauses whose heads can be satisfied in one way only). In this article, we always assume the top-down strategy for selecting clauses and the left-to-right computation rule. We point out that we allow for disjunctive clauses to have empty heads (that is, we allow constraint clauses). Clauses of this form are called constraints (the rest, nonconstraint clauses). A multiset of higher-order program clauses constitute a program in our logic programming language. Observe that the sequences of arguments appear in heads of the clauses in this case. Moreover, 29 learners responded correctly to at least four of the five subject relative clauses without also doing as well on the direct object relatives. Moreover, the instructor reported that neither her teaching materials nor her use of relative clauses in class favored subject relatives. The omission of types with the quantifiers in these clauses illustrates the convention alluded to earlier. Astructure analysis is concerned with the recognition of argumental dependencies between both chunks and clauses. Enforces contract provisions intended to protectthe agency, such as warranties or liquidated damages clauses. There is little mention of complex sentences, relative clauses, adverbial clauses or complementation. The original 147 clauses were expanded and added to, becoming the 238 of the legislation. Two other clauses were to have a vital significance. Many critics point to empirical evidence which fails to support these conditional clauses. On the other hand, however, such clauses are not without danger. Then a grammatical classification is imposed on these events: they are divided into those described by intransitive and those described by transitive clauses. However, relative clauses resemble past tense (or perfective) main clauses in simply describing something that has happened or is happening. Three examples of clauses with preposed adverbs from the different groups may illustrate the difference in the children's performance. However, this is only a technical concession, and using different common notions of clauses would not change our results. In conditional clauses too, as shown in, negative polarity elements can appear. Since our concern in this paper is the study of if- and though-complement clauses, we cannot pursue this topic any further here. All clauses in the sequence are marked with distanced forms, because they are all considered against the hypothetical marriage. The remaining problem to be tackled is the difference in the acceptability of except if in the two types of clauses. These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors. |
反思网英语在线翻译词典收录了377474条英语词汇在线翻译词条，基本涵盖了全部常用英语词汇的中英文双语翻译及用法，是英语学习的有利工具。