Examples of Bill of Rights

This example is from Wikipedia and may be reused under a CC BY-SA license.
What follows is an argument in favour of a billofrights that is subject to legislative and judicial review.
A billofrights does not negate political responsibility to legislate in the public interest.
Most commentators assume that a billofrights will only be effective if it allows judges to correct rights infringements that have occurred in legislation.
This billofrights did not have an appreciable effect on government decisions.
This omission could have serious consequences for the vitality of a billofrights.
In so doing it questions the logic and justification for exclusive reliance on judicial interpretation of a billofrights.
While the new constitution enshrines a billofrights, poverty, unemployment and illiteracy remain essential obstacles to the enjoyment of any rights.
The adoption of a billofrights signals a political community's decision to utilize rights to evaluate the appropriateness of state actions.
Although these concerns are often used to justify rejecting a billofrights, this article takes a different position.
Few contemplate legislative review and assume that the primary political obligation under a billofrights is to redress judicially identified problems in legislation.
This is that for a billofrights to be effective, judicial interpretation must prevail over political judgement.
Most view a billofrights as an explicit restraint on legislative and executive powers.
A more complete interpretation of the scope of a billofrights is that it protects individuals from inappropriate state actions.
Secondly, the article argues that even if one is sceptical about judicial exclusivity for interpreting rights, this scepticism does not warrant rejecting a billofrights altogether.
Moreover, the fact that someone wants individual rights to be protected in a billofrights does not mean that she never trusts her fellow citizens, whatever the circumstances are.
And it may be that the importance of the former rights justify constraints on the exercise of the latter, by way of a billofrights.
Despite the strongly held view that courts, alone, are capable of interpreting a billofrights, the resolution of many rights conflicts are, at heart, philosophical and political.
A billofrights can be structured in a manner, and political and legal cultures can be nurtured to accept, that judges and parliament each have legitimate interpretive roles.
For many, the idea that a billofrights would be subject to legislative review seems to turn the very purpose of having a billofrights on its head.
Even if a political community decides to utilize a billofrights, it is not compelled to give primacy to judicial answers over political judgement when resolving rights conflicts.
The very idea of political scrutiny challenges traditional orthodoxy about a billofrights, which assumes judgement about rights is exclusively or primarily a judicial responsibility.
Fifty-nine townships complained about the third article of the billofrights, which imposed on the citizen an obligation to support some form of public worship.
A national patient billofrights.
We can insist on a billofrights, or we can see our rights eroded.
From Europarl Parallel Corpus - English
Some of those countries have chosen to structure their incorporation legislation so that their billofrights emerges as basic law.
From the
Hansard archive