neoclassicism

Examples of neoclassical

neoclassical
The period saw the radical separation of micro- and macro-economics (a separation denoted, paradoxically, as a 'neoclassical synthesis').
The book concludes with a discussion of some advanced topics and a brief summary of experimental evidence for neoclassical transport theory.
In essence, a 'spot market', so defined is a central model (or paradigm) of what a neoclassical model should look like.
However, all authors cited above examine closed-economy versions of neoclassical models.
Neoclassical theory asserts that trade liberalisation has both static and dynamic benefits.
A synthesized formulation of classical, neoclassical and anomalous transport in toroidal confinement systems with electromagnetic fluctuations and large mean flows is presented.
Some aspects of our social life are either presupposed by neoclassical accounts or are beyond (or outside) their scope.
This paper follows that idea but streamlines the presentation of the loglinear approximate solution for the neoclassical model of capital accumulation.
Also, according to neoclassical theory, women would choose occupations that allow them to take care of the family.
In this paper a neoclassical thermo-conductivity model based on the analysis of the electron trajectories is proposed to describe the sharp electron temperature profile.
A central theoretical theme in the book is the paradox of neoclassical market efficiency.
I believe mainstream economics, and especially the rigorous, formalized neoclassical theories, play a significant yet limited role in this process.
These forms had the advantage of conforming to the neoclassical conditions for constrained consumer maximization.
They undermine the assumption of optimality that is the foundation of the neoclassical analysis.
The fields chosen for comparison are modern physics, modern experimental psychology and modern neoclassical economics.
These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors.