landholder

Examples of landholding

landholding
Households of lineage heads should be among the largest buildings in the corporate landholding and include an architecturally distinct burial shrine.
One was the separation of political leadership and landholding, and the other was a new social homogenization.
As a result the mobility of landholdings increased, the competition for land became more marked and the potential for accumulation greater.
We distinguish here between division of the commons and individualization of privately held landholdings.
The landholding corresponds to all cultivation parcels managed by an individual for his own benefit.
This led to the frequent transfer of landholdings, a fierce and continuous competition for land and ample possibilities for accumulation.
Secondly, historical patterns of landholding also display a powerful effect on self-motivated political participation in my analyses.
Two men, one of whom was single and one whose landholding history is unclear, were excluded.
Commonly, expansion into new territory and the consolidation of landholding was through the creation of canopy clans.
The majority of households which increased their landholdings had two married couples, sometimes even three or four.
As noted, the size of one's landholding in the tank-bed never exceeded a half of his holdings in the service area of the same tank.
The principal advantage in such strategies was the possibility of dividing landholdings between children (instead of primogeniture), and this could include granting land to daughters.
Missing information about landholding has no bearing on the argument of this article since the focus is on the structure of the household.
The land law, for example, sets no upper limits on the maximum size of landholdings.
There is no clear correlation with the size of the landholding : large landholders were neither more nor less likely to hold land jointly than smallholders.
These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors.