词汇 | example_english_scientific |
释义 | Examples of scientificThese examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors. By no means, however, does such a development imply a scientific revolution or paradigm change. Rejuvenation of the academic staff will doubtless also entail scientific modernization and make possible new forms of research and education. The prospect of a deeper scientific understanding of ageing processes and their technical manipulation is encouraging the ' biologisation' of old age. We have a firm scientific foundation for approaching the problem. His scientific career begain in the mid-1930s, when he helped verify the neuron doctrine against the reticular theory. The history of the physics of motion provides an example of adverse effects that everyday experiences may have on the development of scientific theories. Several commentators advocate moderation on the grounds that a scientific approach must secure itself against premature generalizations. They consider plausible alternative explanations, address them with evidence, and promote deeper scientific understanding of evolution and its consequences. Commitment to the scientific enterprise requires that we not accept claims about constraint, exaptation, or spandrel in the absence of evidence. Cartesian dualism is a minority position in contemporary philosophy, at least as a scientific theory of mind, and for very good reason. Scientific theories are often the result of years or decades of hard work, sometimes with many scientists from different laboratories contributing. I also discuss the implications of self-experiments for scientific practices. Surprising new ideas may spring from such scientific adventure! They have scientific interest, though, because they were bidirectional (better mood in the middle of the day, worse mood earlier and later). Just as ostracism can slow economic growth, demands for methodological "correctness" can slow scientific progress. Our target article is the response of committed scientific realists to a paradigmatic instance of a common-sense realist project. Indeed, the lack of disagreement carries over to meta-level debate about the purpose and workings of the scientific enterprise. Not very much scientific investigation has addressed this kind of question. Not every scientific idealization deserves as much respect as that of a perfect gas! Is this article a good discussion of the different scientific criteria used to identify adaptation? The details of this experience were periodically published [5-8] as well as presented at scientific forums. The scientific function of the flowerpot seems less adequate than the function for which it was originally designed! Currently this is more a belief than a concept with convincing scientific support. However, they seek to maintain objectivity to the science, and hence other broader-based methods are viewed as being un-scientific. There is a sound scientific basis for the participants' numerous ways of employing mental rehearsal. Perhaps there are ways of reenchanting the world without surrendering our scientific heritage? A scientific discipline consists not only of amassing facts and explaining them in theories. How can the international scientific community communicate if there is no common language? I think so, but we are talking about quite different aspects of scientific behaviour. The development of the new theory came about in reaction, both normative and scientific, to the anarchy model. In general, the students gravitated to scientific and technical fields. The end-result is an encyclopedic review ofthe basic scientific aspects of the heart and the circulatory system of which they must be very satisfied. Only his own scientific conscience may guide the scholar. Despite these potential benefits, scientific studies evaluating the effectiveness of this exercise machine are limited. The book brings together an inter-disciplinary team of researchers drawing on historical and social-scientific approaches. My perspective on the new journal policy is that, in practice, it is not going to interfere much with scientific communication. The second message is that scientific proof is not a crucial factor in environmental decisionmaking. Hence, it will be essential for members of the scientific community, including physician-researchers, to consider the implications of presenting their data in any form. On the other hand, some leaders of the scientific community supported freer scientific research on human embryos. The answer to this question depends on two factors: (1) the definition of our humanness; and (2) our scientific and technological abilities. They failed more by practising extremism than by choosing any particular scientific option. Anomalies are a cause of some distress within scientific systems and fuel research and the generation of further models. Moreover, there are complementary scientific approaches to investigate meaning! A pattern may be the intersection of separate scientific mechanisms. Subjective views are all very well for people, but for the defence of the environment we need a more scientific approach. The growth of scientific knowledge raises new visions of a modern elixir of life, and the culture of science may give them misplaced concreteness. What characteristics distinguish scientific endeavour that seeks an understanding of the fundamental biology of human ageing from quackery and pseudo-science ? They see the contemporary selling of antiageing ' therapies ' as part of that tradition, not as genuine scientific endeavour. We should not confuse plausible stories with scientific theories or evidence. The transformation of plant breeding into an organized scientific activity raises two questions on incentives for research. First, scientific knowledge accumulates in a domain of science, including understanding of methods, rules of evidence, empirical findings, and synthesis into theory. We know a considerable amount about making policy under conditions of uncertainty, even under conditions of scientific uncertainty. Policy makers should neither ask for firm conclusions when they do not exist, nor interpret scientific results to suit preferred policy outcomes. To study morality, one must provide scientific explanations for the questions of the origin and evolution of moral rules. To the modern scientific mind, these two prescriptive statements are of different types. Furthermore, there is no consideration of internet resources, which surely would be the first point of enquiry for a scientific definition by students today. The second group of variables under legal and economic context addresses various aspects of a country's scientific and technical capacity. We are reminded that basic values and assessment of excellence are not excluded by a more scientific approach. I swore then and there a solemn oath never to try to make the word snark an internationally accepted scientific term. Not surprisingly, stronglybuttressed social stereotypes are extremely tenacious; nevertheless, they can be a poor basis for scientific work. One is the development of a scientific approach to language and that has been partially but not wholly good. A review of changing scientific perspectives about early development frames our argument. In many ways, the current sociocultural and scientific context supports the diagnosis of children. The question of "how early can we tell" is critical from a scientific as well as a policy standpoint. Likewise, we believe it is important to explore sociocultural context as a pathway to understanding the development of the scientific fields involving children. The scientific sessions, and the tearooms and the bars, are buzzing with talk about the latest developments with this procedure. A number of scientific papers resulted from this work. Within the background and scientific domains there are theories that provide intertheoretical links or constraints between other theories. Like all mistaken ideas and premises in science it would have been remedied eventually by the rigors of scientific method. There are intrinsic limitations to governmentality, which stem from the market mechanism and come to light via its scientific study. In fact, it is even more enthusiastic about the ineliminable and central role of models in scientific theorizing. The development of scientific management was embedded in political and moral controversy from the beginning. The reader is then blithely told that scientific models (and maps) are value-free! Theories with a narrow domain are always subject to revision based on successful scientific practice. The early scientific explanations were in principle correct. Empirical reports on scientific competition show that scientists can be depicted as self-interested, strategically behaving agents. As was the case with scientific management, defenders of behavioral psychology made ethical claims, as well as truth claims, in its favor. The consequences for theology of new scientific knowledge also merit more consideration than appears in this text. Rather, his concern is about the status of these events in scientific discourse. When change in the phenomena of interest is the object of scientific study, the scientists are said to be studying the behavior of the phenomena. Advancement of scientific knowledge depends upon scholarship and hypothesis testing, both of which are incomplete in vertes eastman's target article. Other scientific terms from botany, chemistry, medicine, etc. that one might encounter in general entomological works are also included. Heuristics should rather be tested against the other forms of applied rationality, not against utopian scientific models. Anyone who does not believe that their image will do more-or-less what they will it to do is allowing scientific ideology to override common sense. In many instances, case series also serve as valuable intellectual background for future clinical or scientific work. Personal investment in research is, nevertheless, an important driver of scientific progress. Consequently, any initiative that provides open access to scientific literature and databases is extremely useful. They explain the type of ethical truths by supposing it identical with the type of scientific laws. To assess it in the light of experience or common sense or scientific reason is regarded as a denial of faith. The metaphorical nature of human thought is fundamental to scientific discovery and explanation. Beliefs have a less secure position in a critical scientific ontology than, say, electrons or genes. The following entry makes explicit a central feature of the scientific method. Others, like the theory of the death instinct, are founded on scientific speculations which clearly resemble myths. Large scale data sets that are intended to move quickly and effectively into the public use by the scientific community are novel. The author makes his case with care and throws light on both the theological and scientific ideas of his subject. All held for certain that behind the observed pattern there were general laws for which a scientific interpretation had to be supplied. The continuing commitment of public resources to scientific research depends in the long run on the perception of the public served by their interests. Such actions would detract from the scientific integrity of the meeting. The scientific name has the great advantage of being the same all over the world, so the language of nomenclature is a truly international one. These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors. |
反思网英语在线翻译词典收录了377474条英语词汇在线翻译词条,基本涵盖了全部常用英语词汇的中英文双语翻译及用法,是英语学习的有利工具。